<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad: Kindle Killer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danieljdonovan.com/2010/04/kindle-killer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danieljdonovan.com/2010/04/kindle-killer/</link>
	<description>A digital marketing blog by Daniel J. Donovan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:11:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Berthao</title>
		<link>http://www.danieljdonovan.com/2010/04/kindle-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Berthao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danieljdonovan.com/?p=761#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I have a Kindle now and am considering an iPad. I have tried an iPad in the store and it was nice. I look at it as a giant iPod touch (and I like my iPod touch). The one area that the iPad is better for reading is magazines and comics; I read both. So, I see the iPad as an additional device. I just don&#039;t know how it would be to do long term reading on that bright screen. I try to use the Kindle App on my iPod but it is not the same &quot;feel&quot; as the e-ink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Kindle now and am considering an iPad. I have tried an iPad in the store and it was nice. I look at it as a giant iPod touch (and I like my iPod touch). The one area that the iPad is better for reading is magazines and comics; I read both. So, I see the iPad as an additional device. I just don&#39;t know how it would be to do long term reading on that bright screen. I try to use the Kindle App on my iPod but it is not the same &#8220;feel&#8221; as the e-ink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanovan</title>
		<link>http://www.danieljdonovan.com/2010/04/kindle-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>seanovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 09:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danieljdonovan.com/?p=761#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I live in Japan, where space is at a real premium. That means that having too many books forces me to recycle/toss even the books I expect I&#039;d like to read again someday. So e-readers make a lot of sense to me. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As has been said, nobody generates a crowd of gawkers with a Kindle (iPad is a different story), but the reading experience is very close to paper. That&#039;s Amazon&#039;s stated purpose. As a result, Apple&#039;s foray into Amazon&#039;s territory will only help to gain acceptance for ebooks. If Amazon loses 20% market share, but the market itself expands exponentially, this is only good for Amazon. I doubt that even they expect to keep the (by some accounts) 80% market share they currently enjoy. And since the _reading_ experience for the Kindle is so much better (not the multi-media consumption experience of the iPad, of course) then more readers will choose Kindle over other alternatives. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Long story short, the iPad is good for Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Japan, where space is at a real premium. That means that having too many books forces me to recycle/toss even the books I expect I&#39;d like to read again someday. So e-readers make a lot of sense to me. </p>
<p>As has been said, nobody generates a crowd of gawkers with a Kindle (iPad is a different story), but the reading experience is very close to paper. That&#39;s Amazon&#39;s stated purpose. As a result, Apple&#39;s foray into Amazon&#39;s territory will only help to gain acceptance for ebooks. If Amazon loses 20% market share, but the market itself expands exponentially, this is only good for Amazon. I doubt that even they expect to keep the (by some accounts) 80% market share they currently enjoy. And since the _reading_ experience for the Kindle is so much better (not the multi-media consumption experience of the iPad, of course) then more readers will choose Kindle over other alternatives. </p>
<p>Long story short, the iPad is good for Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.danieljdonovan.com/2010/04/kindle-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 13:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danieljdonovan.com/?p=761#comment-30</guid>
		<description>My concern is more around reading for pleasure, as in novels. Strictly text.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, you raise an interesting point. I had not considered technical publications, where the color display would certainly be an enormous advantage. I still wouldn&#039;t want to read on it, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the format issue, this certainly puts even more pressure on Amazon to make the Kindle more open. In the meantime, I just use Savory: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.fsck.com/2009/04/savory.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.fsck.com/2009/04/savory.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern is more around reading for pleasure, as in novels. Strictly text.</p>
<p>Still, you raise an interesting point. I had not considered technical publications, where the color display would certainly be an enormous advantage. I still wouldn&#39;t want to read on it, though.</p>
<p>As for the format issue, this certainly puts even more pressure on Amazon to make the Kindle more open. In the meantime, I just use Savory: <a href="http://blog.fsck.com/2009/04/savory.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fsck.com/2009/04/savory.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan.Dodds</title>
		<link>http://www.danieljdonovan.com/2010/04/kindle-killer/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan.Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danieljdonovan.com/?p=761#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve stopped buying tech books in paper. It kills me to toss any book into the recycling bin but &#039;Beginning iPhone 3 Development&#039; &lt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430224594&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430224594&lt;/a&gt;&gt; doesn&#039;t have much shelf life left.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the tech book collection (which is mostly either PDF or ePub) wouldn&#039;t I be better off with an iPad, if only for the color display and ePub support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve stopped buying tech books in paper. It kills me to toss any book into the recycling bin but &#39;Beginning iPhone 3 Development&#39; &lt;<a href="http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430224594" rel="nofollow">http://www.apress.com/book/view/9781430224594</a>&gt; doesn&#39;t have much shelf life left.</p>
<p>For the tech book collection (which is mostly either PDF or ePub) wouldn&#39;t I be better off with an iPad, if only for the color display and ePub support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

